Progress
Significant progress
Significant progress

Sub-categories

Choose categories from the dropdowns below to see different breakdowns of the data. Some will not be available until a higher level is chosen.

Download headline data (.csv) Download source data (.csv)

Download source data for disaggregations (.csv)

Headline data

Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan or a municipal urban plan
Year Value Units Series GeoCode
2021 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2012 67.46 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2023 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2011 59.13 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2019 88.89 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2010 59.13 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2025 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2020 88.89 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2024 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2016 67.46 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2018 88.89 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2015 67.46 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2022 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2013 67.46 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2014 67.46 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2017 88.89 % Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)
2013 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2024 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2010 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2023 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2014 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2025 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2011 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2017 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2020 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2015 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2016 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2022 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2012 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2021 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2018 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
2019 100.0 % Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)

Geographical Area:

Unit of Measurement:

Footnote: Municipalities that have an urban or territorial plan have a value of 100%

Methodological sheet of the indicator available for the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country.

Available indicator

Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan or a municipal urban plan
Target

11.a Support positive economic, social and environmental links between urban, peri-urban and rural areas by strengthening national and regional development planning
Goal

11- Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Definition

This indicator is composed of two series:

- Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)

- Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)
Theoretical formula

Proportion of municipalities covered by a territorial land use plan (PTP)

\[PMUN_{PTP}^{t} = \frac{MUN_{PTP}^{t}}{MUN^{t}} \cdot 100\]

where:

$MUN_{PTP}^{t} =$ number of municipalities with A territorial land use plan in the year $t$

$MUN^{t} =$ number of municipalities in the year $t$


Proportion of municipalities with a municipal urban plan (PGOU or NNSS)

\[PMUN_{PGOU}^{t} = \frac{MUN_{PGOU}^{t}}{MUN^{t}} \cdot 100\]

where:

$MUN_{PGOU}^{t} =$ number of municipalities with municipal urban plan in the year $t$

$MUN^{t} =$ number of municipalities in the year $t$
Available disaggregations

Province

County

Municipality
Frequency

Annual
Observations

The Territorial Planning Guidelines provide criteria for the quantification of residential planning in Basque municipalities, taking into account the changes in the resident population, the average family size, and the housing demand.

The Partial Territorial Plans develop the Territorial Planning Guidelines in the fifteen geographical areas, known as Functional Areas, and define planning objectives based on an analysis of the state of the territory, its socioeconomic situation, and its potential for development.
Data last updated 2026/01/16
Metadata last updated 2026/10/09

This section provides more information about the United Nations indicator or the European Union Sustainable Development Indicator, such as its rationale, international results, metadata, and other relevant statistics.

Rationale

This indicator is based on the notion that the development and implementation of National Urban Policies should support participation, partnership, cooperation and coordination of actors as well as facilitate dialogue. National Urban Policy (NUP) and Regional Development Plans (RDP) promote coordinated and connected urban development. A coordinated effort from government through a NUP or RDP provides the best opportunity for achieving sustainable urbanization and balanced territorial development by linking sectorial policies, connecting national, regional and local government policies, strengthening urban, peri-urban and rural links through balanced territorial development.

This indicator provides a good barometer on global progress on sustainable national urban policies. It serves as gap analysis to support policy recommendations. The indicator can identify good practices and policies among countries that can promote partnership and cooperation between all stakeholders. This indicator is both process oriented and aspirational and has the potential to support the validation of Goal 11 and other SDGs indicators with an urban component. The indicator has the ability to be applicable at multi jurisdictions levels, i.e covering a number of areas while taking care of urban challenges in a more integrated national manner.

Source: United Nations Statistics Division
Comparability between the available indicator and the UN indicator

The available indicator partially complies with the United Nations metadata.
International results

Countries that have national urban policies or regional development plans that respond to population dynamics; ensure balanced territorial development; and increase local fiscal space (1 = YES; 0 = NO) SD_CPA_UPRDP UNSTATS
Link to UN metadata

Metadata 11-a-1.pdf
Back to top